Mahathir meets Zakir Naik day after ruling out his deportation to India

Deporting the Islamic preacher would be akin to deporting Uighur Muslims to China, says a strategist of the country’s ruling party.

Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad has met Zakir Naik, wanted in India for alleged terror activities and money laundering, and a ruling party strategist has stoutly defended the government’s decision not to deport the controversial Muslim preacher, Malaysian media reported on July 8.

The meeting, which may not go down well in New Delhi, took place on July 7, a day after Dr. Mahathir ruled out deporting Dr. Naik unless he breaks Malaysian laws. Dr. Naik has permanent residency status in Malaysia, .

“I can confirm that Naik went to see Tun (Mahathir) this morning (Saturday),” Free Malaysia Today reported quoting a source as saying.

It is unclear as to what Dr. Naik discussed with Dr. Mahathir in their first meeting since the ruling Pakatan Harapan coalition assumed power in Putrajaya, the report said. The meeting, which was unscheduled, was said to be brief, it said.

The meeting between Dr. Naik and Dr. Mahathir comes a day after the Prime Minister gave the clearest indication yet that the Malaysian government would not deport Dr. Naik, who is wanted in India over allegations of money laundering and terrorism.

There had been intense media speculation in India that the Malaysian government would act on an extradition request made in January. The Ministry of External Affairs confirmed on July 4 that an official request had been made.

But on July 6, Dr. Mahathir said that the government would not deport Dr. Naik as he has been granted Malaysian permanent resident status, unless he causes trouble in the country.

Meanwhile, a strategist of Malaysia’s ruling Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia (PPBM) has defended Dr. Mahathir’s decision not to deport Dr. Naik to India, saying doing so would be akin to deporting Uighur Muslims to China. PPBM strategist Rais Hussin said he personally could see no wrong in Dr. Naik’s activities and speeches.

Deporting him would be akin to deporting Uighur Muslims to China, he said, referring to China pressing Malaysia for the extradition of 11 Uighur men who entered Malaysia illegally in 2017 after their dramatic escape from a jail in Thailand.

China accuses separatist extremists among the Uighur minority of plotting attacks on China’s Han majority in the restive far western region of Xinjiang and other parts of China. But rights groups have accused China of rights abuses in Xinjiang and imposing tight control on the religion of Uighurs, a charge denied by Beijing.

Mr. Rais also took issue with criticism of Dr. Naik on social media. He said the Indian Islamic preacher had his own way of articulating his views through debates.

Dr. Naik’s detractors — those with “a mob mentality” — should debate him rather than asking him to be deported to India, he said. Mr. Rais also questioned the motives of the Indian authorities whose action, he said, might not be grounded in justice.

In January, India made a formal request to Malaysia to deport Dr. Naik, wanted by India for allegedly inciting youngsters for terror activities through his hate speeches. India also has an extradition treaty with Malaysia.

Mr. Rais also said that it was unfair of some Malaysians to compare the country’s attempts to bring back convicted killer Sirul Azhar Umar and businessman Low Taek Jho with Malaysia’s stand on deporting Dr. Naik to India.

“Sirul was found guilty of murdering Altantuya Shaariibuu, while Jho Low is implicated in grand theft in relation to the 1 Malaysia Development Berhad case. How does that compare to Naik’s comparative debates on religion?” Mr. Rais was quoted as saying. In 2009, Sirul was convicted in Malaysia and sentenced to death for the sensational murder of a Mongolian woman, Altantuya Shaariibuu.

Dr. Naik has also accused the media in India of subjecting him to a campaign of vilification over the past two years. He said “fake news” about his deportation would be exposed. “Most of the articles published against me will be proved as having no basis and that they were false,” he said in a new video message through his Facebook page.

Dr. Naik is being probed under terror and money laundering charges by the National Investigation Agency (NIA). He left India in July 2016.

The NIA had first registered a case against Dr. Naik under anti-terror laws in 2016 for allegedly promoting enmity between different religious groups. Dr. Naik is also under investigation for issuing alleged hate speeches that inspired a deadly terror attack on a popular cafe in Bangladesh capital Dhaka in 2016.

Source: Read Full Article